STORY
5. Three Students
by Jeannette Armstrong
CHARACTERS
Sherlock Holmes: The brilliant and renowned detective who is
consulted by Mr. Hilton Soames to solve the mystery of the tampered scholarship
exam question paper.
Dr. John Watson:
The loyal friend and narrator of the story, who accompanies Holmes in his
investigations.
Mr. Hilton Soames: A
distressed lecturer from St. Luke’s College, who seeks Holmes' help in
uncovering the culprit responsible for tampering with the scholarship exam
question paper.
Bannister: The
trusted servant at St. Luke’s College, who is involved in the incident and
plays a crucial role in the resolution of the case.
Sir Jabez Gilchrist: The
father of one of the students, Mr. Gilchrist, who was a wealthy man but fell on
hard times. He used to employ Bannister as a butler.
Mr. Gilchrist: One
of the three students who were taking the scholarship exam. He is a hardworking
athlete with a background that ties him to Bannister.
Daulat Ras: An
Indian student who is one of the three students taking the scholarship exam. He
is described as methodical and diligent.
Miles McLaren: One
of the three students taking the scholarship exam. He is considered brilliant
but somewhat wayward in his behavior.
SUMMARY
Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) was a Scottish-born English author known for
creating Sherlock Holmes. After studying medicine in Edinburgh, he settled in
London and had diverse careers including historian, whaler, and war
correspondent. His first Holmes story, "A Study in Scarlet" (1887),
gained popularity, leading him to focus on writing. Despite initially killing
off Holmes, Doyle was pressured by readers to revive the character. "The
Three Students" is a Sherlock Holmes story involving the theft of a
scholarship exam question paper. A teacher and three students seek Holmes'
help, and he effortlessly identifies the culprit using a simple clue, a
hallmark of Doyle's detective stories.
In
the year 95, Sherlock Holmes and the narrator visit a university town. They're
approached by Mr. Hilton Soames, a distressed lecturer from St. Luke’s College.
Soames explains that a crucial exam paper was tampered with. Holmes advises
involving the police, but Soames insists on discretion. Soames, an examiner,
left the paper unattended briefly, and upon return, found it disturbed.
Bannister, a trusted servant, accidentally left a key in the door. Holmes
deduces someone entered and moved the papers. The incident jeopardizes a
valuable scholarship, motivating a potential saboteur. Soames seeks Holmes'
help in uncovering the culprit for the sake of the college's reputation.
Mr.
Hilton Soames seeks Sherlock Holmes' help after a crucial scholarship exam
paper is tampered with at St. Luke’s College. Bannister, a servant, is
distraught, believing he left the door unlocked. Holmes inspects the room,
noticing pencil shreds and a cut on Soames' writing table. Soames reveals an
Indian student, Daulat Ras, visited, but it's unclear if he recognized the
papers. Holmes suggests the intruder stumbled upon them accidentally. They
investigate the scene, finding no evidence of forced entry. Holmes hints at an
unconventional approach. The room overlooks an ancient courtyard, with a worn
staircase leading to the students' quarters.
Holmes
examines the lecturer's room, noting that the intruder took exam papers from
the central table to a window table for a clear escape route. Soames confirms
he entered through a side door, not the courtyard. Holmes deduces the intruder
copied the papers hastily, breaking his pencil. He identifies the unique pencil
characteristics and mentions a large, blunt knife in the intruder's possession.
Holmes analyzes a pellet of black dough with sawdust specks, discovering it's
roughly pyramidal and hollowed. He inspects a tear on the table. Holmes then
explores Soames' bedroom, finding nothing unusual behind a curtain. Suddenly,
he notices something significant on the floor.
Holmes
examines a black, putty-like substance in Soames' bedroom, indicating the
intruder's attempt to hide. Soames suggests an alternative escape route through
his lattice-paned window. Holmes dismisses this, emphasizing practicality.
Three students use the stair and are taking the exam, with no clear suspicions.
Soames describes the occupants: Gilchrist, a hardworking athlete; Daulat Ras, a
methodical Indian scholar; and McLaren, a brilliant but wayward student. Of the
three, McLaren is considered the least unlikely suspect. Holmes then questions
Bannister, a nervous servant who accidentally left the door unlocked. Bannister
admits to similar oversights in the past.
Bannister,
the servant, recounts entering Soames' room around half-past four, intending to
bring tea. He left the key in the door, but when he saw Soames was absent, he
withdrew immediately. Holmes questions him about the lock and confirms that
anyone in the room could leave. Bannister, visibly disturbed, affirms he didn't
inform the gentlemen about the incident. Holmes then asks to see the three
men's rooms. Gilchrist, a scholar and athlete, welcomes them. The Indian,
Daulat Ras, eyes them suspiciously. The visit to McLaren's room is met with
hostility, as he prepares for an upcoming exam. Soames finds McLaren's behavior
suspicious.
Holmes
asks Soames about the suspect's height and abruptly leaves, causing Soames to
express concern. Holmes reassures him and advises against making any changes.
Outside, they observe the suspects' behavior. Watson leans towards suspecting
the foul-mouthed student, while Holmes is intrigued by the servant, Bannister.
They visit stationers in search of a matching pencil, but are unsuccessful.
Holmes remains optimistic about the case. The next morning, Holmes believes he
has solved the mystery, revealing three pyramids of black clay as evidence. He
asserts his conclusion, leaving Watson eager to learn more.
Holmes
presents three pyramids of black clay, suggesting they came from the same
source. They confront Soames, who is distressed over the impending examination
and the scholarship dilemma. Holmes proposes a private inquiry. Bannister,
visibly anxious, denies any wrongdoing. Holmes hints at Bannister concealing
evidence on the chair. Bannister vehemently denies it, but Holmes accuses him
of lying. Soames retrieves Gilchrist, who appears bewildered. Holmes questions
Gilchrist about his actions, expressing disbelief in his involvement. Gilchrist
looks at Bannister with shock and disappointment. The mystery deepens as Holmes
tries to unravel the truth behind the incident.
Gilchrist
vehemently denies disclosing anything to Bannister. Holmes presses Gilchrist
for a confession, leading him to break down in tears. Holmes proposes to
explain the situation to Soames, but Gilchrist agrees to confess. Holmes
reveals his deductions: Gilchrist, a long-distance jumper, spotted the proofs
on Soames's table due to his height. When he saw the key, he entered,
pretending to ask a question. He took the proofs to copy, but when he heard
Soames at the door, he panicked and hid in the bedroom, leaving behind a trail
of evidence. Gilchrist confirms Holmes's account. He admits planning to decline
the examination before the exposure. Bannister's role remains unexplained.
Bannister,
the servant, explains that he was once the butler for Sir Jabez Gilchrist, the
father of the accused. He recognized the tan gloves as belonging to young
Gilchrist, realizing the gravity of the situation. Bannister's actions were
driven by a desire to protect the young man and uphold the memory of his late
father. Holmes, understanding Bannister's motive, commends him for his loyalty.
The case is resolved, and they head home for breakfast. Holmes wishes the young
man success in Rhodesia, urging him to rise above his past mistake.
A. Multiple Choice Questions
1. Mr. Hilton Soames taught.........................
a) Logics
b)
Mathematics
c)
Greek
d)
Latin
2. Mr. Soames taught at..................
a)
a local high school
b)
College of St. Luke's
c) the Municipal college
d)
St. Lawrence's college
3. The detective Sherlock Holmes lived
in...................................
a) Downing Street
b)
Oxford Street
c)
Abbey Street
d)
Baker Street
4. Sherlock Holmes was called because of the theft of
the..................
a) question papers
b)
diamond Necklace
c)
blue carbuncle
d)
purse
5. After an investigation,............was proved guilty of the
theft in the teacher's room
a)
Mr. Daulat Ras
b)
Mr. Watson
c)
Mr. Gilchrist
d)
Mr. Soames
Extra MCQs
1. What is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle best known for creating?
a) St. Luke’s College
b) Sherlock Holmes
c) Mr. Hilton Soames
d) The narrator
2. After studying medicine in Edinburgh, what diverse careers
did Doyle have?
a) Historian, whaler, and war correspondent
b) Lawyer, engineer, and teacher
c) Scientist, musician, and artist
d) Actor, chef, and farmer
3. What was the title of Doyle's first Sherlock Holmes story?
a) The Three Students
b) A Study in Scarlet
c) The Hound of the Baskervilles
d) The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
4. Why did Mr. Hilton Soames approach Sherlock Holmes for help?
a) He lost a valuable item.
b) A scholarship exam question paper was
tampered with.
c) He needed legal advice.
d) He wanted to learn detective skills.
5. Who is Bannister in the story?
a) A student at St. Luke’s College
b) The narrator's friend
c) A servant at St. Luke’s College
d) A police officer
6. What did Holmes deduce from the pencil shreds and cut on
Soames' writing table?
a) The height of the intruder
b) The location of the stolen papers
c) The identity of the culprit
d) The motive behind the crime
7. How did the intruder likely enter Soames' room?
a) Through the main gate
b) Through the lattice-paned window
c) Through the side door
d) Through the courtyard
8. Which student is considered the least unlikely suspect?
a) Gilchrist
b) Daulat Ras
c) McLaren
d) None of the above
9. Why did Bannister leave the key in the door?
a) He was in a hurry.
b) It was an accident.
c) He forgot to take it out.
d) He wanted to make it look like an
intruder entered.
10. What was Holmes' suggestion to Mr. Soames regarding the
incident?
a) Involve the police immediately.
b) Keep the matter discreet and seek
Holmes' help.
c) Take no action and forget about the
incident.
d) Confront the suspected students
directly.
11. What did Holmes find in Soames' bedroom that was
significant?
a) A hidden compartment
b) A torn curtain
c) A peculiar mark on the floor
d) A secret passageway
12. What did the servant Bannister accidentally leave in the
door?
a) A letter
b) A key
c) A pencil
d) A glove
13. How did Holmes determine the height required to see the
papers on the table from outside?
a) He guessed it based on intuition.
b) He measured it using a tape measure.
c) He made a rough estimate based on his
own height.
d) He consulted an architectural plan of
the building.
14. What did Holmes suggest about the servant Bannister's
actions?
a) He deliberately left the door unlocked.
b) He was involved in the theft of the exam
paper.
c) He inadvertently provided an opportunity
for the intruder.
d) He was trying to frame someone for the
crime.
15. What did Holmes identify as a potential clue in the
investigation?
a) A hallmark on the stolen papers
b) A unique pencil characteristic
c) A handwritten note left behind by the
intruder
d) A hidden compartment in Soames' room
16. What was the motive behind the theft of the scholarship exam
question paper?
a) To expose a cheating student
b) To obtain a scholarship unfairly
c) To challenge Holmes' detective skills
d) To embarrass Mr. Hilton Soames
17. Who does Holmes suspect to be the potential saboteur
initially?
a) Gilchrist
b) Daulat Ras
c) Bannister
d) McLaren
18. What is Holmes' reaction to the servant Bannister's
explanation for leaving the key in the door?
a) He accuses Bannister of lying.
b) He commends Bannister for his honesty.
c) He dismisses Bannister's explanation.
d) He expresses sympathy for Bannister's
mistake.
19. How does Holmes ultimately identify the culprit?
a) Through fingerprints left at the crime
scene
b) By analyzing the handwriting on the exam
paper
c) Based on the unique characteristics of a
pencil
d) Through a confession from one of the
suspects
20. What does Holmes suggest about the potential escape route
through the lattice-paned window?
a) It is a likely scenario for the
intruder's entry.
b) It is an improbable means of escape.
c) It is a possibility, but not the most
practical.
d) It is the only logical explanation.
21. What is the significance of the black, putty-like substance
found in Soames' bedroom?
a) It indicates the intruder's attempt to
hide.
b) It is a clue left behind by the culprit.
c) It is unrelated to the investigation.
d) It is a common household item.
22. What does Holmes suggest about the servant Bannister's
actions?
a) He was involved in the theft of the exam
paper.
b) He was trying to protect someone.
c) He was careless in his duties.
d) He deliberately left the door unlocked.
23. What is Holmes' advice to Mr. Soames regarding the
situation?
a) Take no action and forget about the
incident.
b) Seek the assistance of the police
immediately.
c) Involve the college administration in
the investigation.
d) Wait for Holmes to provide further
guidance.
24. Who confesses to the theft of the exam paper?
a) Daulat Ras
b) McLaren
c) Gilchrist
d) Bannister
25. What is the final outcome of the case?
a) The culprit is apprehended, and the
scholarship is saved.
b) The scholarship is canceled, and the
exam is re-administered.
c) The college reputation is tarnished, and
the case remains unsolved.
d) The culprit escapes, and the scholarship
is awarded to a different student.
B. Short Questions
1. According to Watson, what is the purpose of the story?
In
"The Three Students," Dr. John Watson, the narrator and companion of
Sherlock Holmes, reflects on the purpose of the story. He believes that the
case serves as an excellent example of Holmes' unparalleled deductive reasoning
and astute observational skills. Watson asserts that the case is not one of
extraordinary complexity or high stakes, but rather a seemingly mundane
incident involving a missing exam paper at St. Luke’s College. However, Watson
is quick to emphasize that Holmes approaches each case with the same level of
intensity and dedication, regardless of its perceived significance.
Watson
also highlights Holmes' unique ability to draw accurate conclusions from
seemingly trivial details, a hallmark of his investigative prowess. He points
out that Holmes' attention to minute clues, such as pencil shreds and the
position of the stolen papers, leads to the swift resolution of the case.
Additionally, Watson appreciates how Holmes combines logic and intuition to
unravel the mystery, showcasing his exceptional problem-solving skills.
Furthermore,
Watson believes that the story serves as a testament to Holmes' commitment to
justice and his willingness to assist those in need, even in seemingly minor
matters. Despite the relatively low stakes of the case, Holmes approaches it
with his characteristic passion and determination, ultimately ensuring a just
outcome for all parties involved.
Overall,
Watson sees "The Three Students" as a compelling illustration of
Holmes' brilliance, demonstrating that no case is too small or insignificant
for him to apply his extraordinary talents and provide a resolution that
upholds truth and fairness.
2. What had happened to Mr. Hilton Soames' room?
In
"The Three Students," Mr. Hilton Soames, a lecturer at St. Luke’s
College, seeks the assistance of Sherlock Holmes after a significant incident
in his room. Soames explains that he had left a crucial scholarship exam paper
unattended for a brief period. Upon his return, he discovered that the paper
had been tampered with. The room itself showed signs of disturbance, indicating
that someone had entered in his absence.
Holmes
meticulously inspects the room, observing specific details. He notices pencil
shreds on Soames' writing table, suggesting that the intruder had been writing
or copying something. Additionally, Holmes identifies a cut on the writing
table, indicating that some kind of tool or instrument had been used. These
observations serve as crucial clues to understanding the nature of the
intrusion.
Furthermore,
Holmes questions Soames about the potential entry points to the room. Soames
reveals that he had entered through a side door, not through the courtyard,
dismissing the possibility of an intruder entering from that direction. This
detail eliminates one potential avenue for the culprit's entry.
Overall,
the incident in Mr. Hilton Soames' room involved the unauthorized access and
tampering of a scholarship exam paper, creating a significant dilemma for both
Soames and the college. It is this event that prompts Soames to seek Sherlock
Holmes' expertise in uncovering the identity of the culprit.
3. Why did Mr. Soames think Sherlock Holmes better than the
police for his case?
Mr.
Hilton Soames believed Sherlock Holmes would be better suited to handle his
case than the police for several reasons. Firstly, Soames approached Holmes
with a very specific and somewhat delicate problem: the tampering of a scholarship
exam paper at St. Luke’s College. He needed a discreet and specialized
approach, which he believed Holmes could provide. Holmes was known for his keen
powers of observation, deductive reasoning, and ability to solve intricate
mysteries, qualities that Soames thought would be invaluable in this case.
Secondly,
Soames had a preference for confidentiality. He wished to avoid unnecessary
publicity or scandal surrounding the incident, especially since it involved the
reputation of the college. He believed that involving the police might lead to
a more formal and potentially disruptive investigation. Holmes, on the other
hand, was known for his discretion and ability to conduct inquiries with
minimal disruption.
Additionally,
Soames may have had confidence in Holmes' reputation. As a renowned consulting
detective, Holmes had a track record of successfully solving complex cases that
had stumped both the police and other investigators. Soames likely saw Holmes
as a reliable and proven expert in his field.
Overall,
Mr. Soames believed that Sherlock Holmes' unique skills, discretion, and
reputation made him the ideal choice for resolving the intricate matter of the
tampered exam paper at St. Luke’s College.
4. According to Soames, what traces were left by the culprit?
According
to Mr. Hilton Soames, the traces left by the culprit were primarily centered
around the exam room where the tampering occurred. Soames explained to Sherlock
Holmes that he had left the room briefly, only to return and find the
scholarship exam paper disturbed. This indicated that someone had entered the
room during his absence.
Upon
closer examination, Soames pointed out specific clues to Holmes. Firstly, he
noted pencil shreds on the writing table, suggesting that the intruder had been
using a pencil. Additionally, there was a noticeable cut on the table,
indicating some form of activity or disturbance.
Furthermore,
Soames mentioned that the servant, Bannister, had inadvertently left a key in
the door. This provided an opportunity for the intruder to enter the room
easily. Holmes surmised that the culprit likely took advantage of this
oversight.
Overall,
according to Soames, the traces left by the culprit included the pencil shreds,
the cut on the table, and the fact that the key had been left in the door,
allowing for easy access to the room. These were the key pieces of evidence
that led Soames to seek Sherlock Holmes' help in uncovering the identity of the
perpetrator.
5. How does the author describe the university teacher's house
and the inner rooms?
The
author describes the university teacher's house and the inner rooms with a keen
attention to detail, emphasizing both their physical characteristics and the
atmosphere within.
The
teacher's house is located in a university town, suggesting an academic
environment. The specifics of its location are not detailed, but it is
mentioned to be in close proximity to St. Luke’s College, where the teacher,
Mr. Hilton Soames, is employed. The house is not described extensively, but its
significance lies in its connection to the university, which is the focal point
of the story.
The
inner rooms, particularly Mr. Soames' office or study, are depicted as a place
of intellectual activity. It is where Soames, an examiner, was tasked with
overseeing the scholarship exam. The room contains a central table, which plays
a pivotal role in the story, as it holds the exam papers that were tampered
with. The atmosphere within the room is tense and uneasy, reflecting the
gravity of the situation. The room's furnishings are not elaborated upon, but
it is implied to be a functional space, befitting a teacher's study.
Overall,
the author's description of the university teacher's house and the inner rooms
conveys a sense of academia, intellectual pursuit, and the weight of
responsibility associated with overseeing important examinations.
6. Why did the intruder copy the question paper?
The
intruder copied the question paper because they sought to gain an unfair
advantage in the scholarship exam. The question paper contained valuable
information and provided a significant edge to whoever had access to it. By
copying the contents, the intruder aimed to familiarize themselves with the
questions in advance, allowing them to prepare more thoroughly and increase
their chances of securing the scholarship.
This
act was driven by a desire to excel in the examination, potentially for
personal gain or recognition. The scholarship held significant value, and the
competition among students was evidently fierce. By obtaining a copy of the
question paper, the intruder attempted to tip the scales in their favor, even
if it meant resorting to deceitful and unethical means.
The
intruder's decision to copy the paper was a calculated move, taking advantage
of a momentary lapse in security when Mr. Soames briefly left the room
unattended. This act reflects a willingness to go to great lengths to achieve
their goal, demonstrating a level of determination and resourcefulness.
However, as the story unfolds, Sherlock Holmes skillfully uncovers the truth
behind the incident, ultimately thwarting the intruder's scheme.
7. Why does Holmes talk about the sitting room and the bedroom?
Holmes
focuses on investigating both the sitting room and the bedroom in order to
gather evidence and gain insights into the sequence of events surrounding the
tampering of the scholarship exam paper. By meticulously examining these two
spaces, Holmes aims to uncover clues that may lead to the identification of the
perpetrator.
In
the sitting room, Holmes pays attention to details like the placement of
objects, signs of forced entry, and any unusual or out-of-place items. This
meticulous examination helps him reconstruct the events that took place when
the tampering occurred. For example, he observes pencil shreds and a cut on Mr.
Soames' writing table, which provide important information about how the
intruder interacted with the room.
Moving
to the bedroom, Holmes continues his investigation. He discovers a black,
putty-like substance on the floor, indicating the intruder's attempt to hide.
This finding provides further evidence of the intruder's presence and
activities. Additionally, Holmes inspects a tear on the table, which may hold
additional clues about the tampering.
By
thoroughly investigating both the sitting room and the bedroom, Holmes gains a
comprehensive understanding of the crime scene. This detailed examination is
crucial for piecing together the puzzle and ultimately identifying the
individual responsible for the tampering of the exam paper.
8. How does the teacher describe three students Sir Jabez
Gilchrist, Daulat Ras and Miles McLaren?
Mr.
Hilton Soames provides descriptions of the three students, Sir Jabez Gilchrist,
Daulat Ras, and Miles McLaren, to Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson.
Sir
Jabez Gilchrist: Soames describes Gilchrist as a hardworking and diligent
student, known for his athletic abilities, particularly long-distance jumping.
Gilchrist is depicted as someone who is disciplined and dedicated to his
studies, combining intellectual pursuits with physical prowess. This
characterization suggests that Gilchrist is committed to both academic
excellence and athletic achievement, making him a well-rounded individual.
Daulat
Ras: Soames portrays Daulat Ras as a methodical and systematic scholar. As an
Indian student, Daulat Ras is likely distinguished by his meticulous approach
to his studies. Soames' description indicates that Daulat Ras is characterized
by a focused and detail-oriented mindset, which could be a reflection of his
academic prowess and dedication to learning.
Miles
McLaren: According to Soames, McLaren is a brilliant but wayward student. This
description suggests that McLaren possesses exceptional intelligence and
academic potential. However, his wayward nature implies a certain level of
recklessness or lack of discipline, indicating that he may not always apply
himself to his studies in a consistent manner. Despite his brilliance,
McLaren's behavior may make him a less predictable and potentially more
troublesome student compared to his peers.
These
descriptions provide insight into the personalities and tendencies of the three
students, helping Holmes and Watson assess their potential involvement in the
tampering of the scholarship exam paper.
9. Why would Soames not allow Holmes to go home without solving
the case?
Mr.
Hilton Soames is deeply invested in resolving the case of the tampered
scholarship exam paper at St. Luke’s College. He is unwilling to allow Sherlock
Holmes to leave without solving the mystery for several reasons.
Firstly,
the reputation of the college is at stake. Soames, as an examiner and lecturer,
holds a position of responsibility, and any scandal or unresolved issue
involving the exam paper could tarnish the college's standing. It is crucial
for Soames to demonstrate that the college takes matters of academic integrity
seriously and is committed to upholding the fairness and credibility of the
examination process.
Additionally,
the scholarship itself holds significant value. It represents an opportunity
for a deserving student to advance their education and prospects. If the
tampering incident is not resolved, it could result in an undeserving candidate
benefiting from the scholarship, potentially depriving a more qualified student
of this valuable opportunity.
Furthermore,
Soames likely feels a personal sense of duty towards the students. He is
invested in their success and wants to ensure that the scholarship is awarded
to the most deserving candidate based on merit. Allowing Holmes to leave
without a resolution would mean leaving a cloud of suspicion and uncertainty
over the entire examination process.
Overall,
Soames' insistence on solving the case reflects his commitment to upholding the
integrity of the college, ensuring fairness in the scholarship award, and
fulfilling his duty as an educator and examiner.
10. How did Holmes find the clue of the theft?
Sherlock
Holmes discovered the clue of the theft by carefully observing the details in
Mr. Hilton Soames' room at St. Luke’s College. He paid close attention to
seemingly insignificant elements and used deductive reasoning to draw
conclusions.
Firstly,
Holmes noticed the presence of pencil shreds on the floor and a cut on Soames'
writing table. This indicated that someone had been using a pencil in the room
recently, suggesting possible tampering with the exam papers.
Secondly,
Holmes inquired about the Indian student, Daulat Ras, who had visited Soames.
Though it was uncertain whether Ras recognized the papers, Holmes considered
the possibility that the intruder stumbled upon them accidentally during his
visit.
Holmes
also examined the layout of the room, particularly the arrangement of tables.
He deduced that the intruder had taken exam papers from the central table to a
window table for a clear escape route, demonstrating a level of planning and
forethought.
Additionally,
Holmes analyzed the characteristics of the intruder, considering factors like
height and agility. This helped him formulate theories about how the theft
might have been executed.
By
meticulously piecing together these details and using his deductive skills,
Holmes was able to uncover the clue of the theft and ultimately identify the
culprit behind the tampered exam paper. His keen powers of observation and
logical reasoning were instrumental in solving the mystery.
11. Why are jumping shoes important in the story?
Jumping
shoes are significant in the story because they provide a crucial piece of
evidence that helps Sherlock Holmes solve the mystery. In the narrative, Mr.
Hilton Soames mentions that one of the students, Sir Jabez Gilchrist, is a
long-distance jumper. This information piques Holmes' interest.
Holmes
deduces that Gilchrist's jumping shoes could be related to the case. He
surmises that the shoes, which are equipped with sharp spikes, may have been
used by the intruder in some way. This deduction indicates Holmes' keen ability
to connect seemingly unrelated pieces of information.
Later
in the story, when Holmes inspects the room, he notices pencil shreds, a cut on
Soames' writing table, and the absence of gloves near the window. These
observations lead him to conclude that the intruder copied the exam papers
hastily and broke his pencil in the process.
Holmes'
theory is further supported when he finds a pellet of black dough with sawdust
specks, which he determines to be roughly pyramidal and hollowed. This
discovery, along with the evidence from the room, strengthens his case against
Gilchrist.
Ultimately,
the jumping shoes serve as a vital clue in Holmes' investigation, demonstrating
his exceptional ability to draw connections between seemingly unrelated details
and use them to solve the mystery of the tampered exam paper.
12. Why did Banister help Gilchrist from being exposed in front
of the teacher?
Bannister,
the servant, helped Gilchrist from being exposed in front of the teacher
because of his deep sense of loyalty and a desire to protect the young man.
Bannister had once served as the butler for Sir Jabez Gilchrist, the father of
the accused student. Despite the family's downfall, Bannister maintained a
strong attachment to the Gilchrists and harbored a sense of responsibility
towards them.
When
Bannister saw the tan gloves belonging to young Gilchrist in the teacher's
room, he immediately recognized their significance. Realizing the gravity of
the situation and understanding that the exposure could have severe
consequences for Gilchrist, Bannister decided to take matters into his own
hands. He chose to protect the young man's reputation and uphold the memory of
his late father.
Bannister's
actions were driven by a genuine concern for Gilchrist's well-being and a
desire to prevent any further harm or disgrace to the family. He believed that
by intervening and preventing Gilchrist from being exposed in front of the
teacher, he was acting in the best interests of the young man and honoring the
legacy of his late employer. Bannister's loyalty and sense of duty played a
pivotal role in the resolution of the case.
C. Long Questions
1. What do you think is the intention of Mr. Gilchrist in
stealing the question paper?
In
the story "The Three Students," there is no indication or evidence to
suggest that Sir Jabez Gilchrist had any intention of stealing the question
paper. The narrative primarily revolves around the investigation into the
tampering of the scholarship exam paper at St. Luke’s College, conducted by
Sherlock Holmes.
The
main characters include Mr. Hilton Soames, the distressed lecturer seeking
Holmes' help; Bannister, the nervous servant who accidentally left the door
unlocked; and three students: Sir Jabez Gilchrist, Daulat Ras, and Miles
McLaren. The story focuses on their interactions and potential involvement in
the incident.
Mr.
Gilchrist's intention to steal the question paper was likely driven by a
combination of ambition and desperation. As a student at St. Luke's College, he
was faced with the opportunity to gain a valuable scholarship through the
examination. However, for reasons not explicitly mentioned in the text, Mr.
Gilchrist felt compelled to resort to stealing the question paper in order to
gain an unfair advantage.
His
actions may have been motivated by a desire to secure a brighter future for
himself, potentially to overcome personal or financial challenges. The
scholarship represented a significant opportunity for academic and financial
advancement, which Mr. Gilchrist might have felt was crucial for his prospects.
It's
important to note that the story doesn't provide explicit details about Mr.
Gilchrist's circumstances or motivations, leaving room for interpretation.
However, based on his willingness to engage in such a risky and dishonest act,
it can be inferred that he saw the scholarship as a pivotal turning point in
his life, compelling him to take drastic measures.
Ultimately,
Mr. Gilchrist's intention was to gain an unfair advantage in the examination,
potentially driven by a deep-seated need for personal or academic validation,
and a desire to overcome challenges he may have been facing.
2. In almost all Sherlock Holmes stories, Holmes sees the minute
details of things that are not noticed by other characters. Read the story
again and find out such minute observations made by Holmes in the story.
In
"The Three Students," Sherlock Holmes showcases his exceptional
powers of observation and deduction by noticing minute details that go
unnoticed by others. Here are some instances:
Pencil
Shreds and Cut on Soames' Writing Table: Holmes observes pencil shreds and a
cut on Hilton Soames' writing table. This leads him to deduce that the intruder
hastily copied the exam paper.
Position
of Exam Papers: Holmes notes that the intruder rearranged the exam papers from
the central table to a window table. This indicates a calculated escape route.
Key
in the Door: Holmes immediately picks up on the significance of Bannister
accidentally leaving the key in the door. This small detail suggests a possible
entry point for the intruder.
Black
Clay and Sawdust Pellet: Holmes examines a pellet of black dough with sawdust
specks, which reveals that it is roughly pyramidal and hollowed. This helps him
piece together the events.
Torn
Tablecloth: In Soames' bedroom, Holmes spots a small tear on the tablecloth.
This detail becomes significant in understanding the intruder's movements.
Window
Latch and Practicality: Holmes dismisses the idea of the intruder escaping
through the window, emphasizing practicality. This observation leads him to
conclude that the intruder used the main entrance.
Unique
Pencil Characteristics: Holmes identifies the unique characteristics of the
pencil used by the intruder. This proves crucial in narrowing down the
suspects.
Gloves
on the Chair: Bannister, the servant, notices Mr. Gilchrist's tan gloves on a
chair. Holmes recognizes the significance of these gloves and understands their
message.
These
minute observations and deductions showcase Holmes' unparalleled ability to
perceive and interpret even the smallest details. It's this keen attention to
seemingly insignificant elements that allows him to solve complex mysteries.
His methods demonstrate that often, it's the overlooked and subtle clues that
hold the key to unraveling a case.
3. Compare and contrast the roles of Dr. Watson and
Sherlock Holmes.
Dr.
John Watson and Sherlock Holmes are the iconic duo in Arthur Conan Doyle's
Sherlock Holmes stories, and while they work closely together, their roles and
characteristics are distinct and complementary.
Sherlock
Holmes
The
Detective Genius: Holmes is the brilliant detective known for his unparalleled
powers of observation, deduction, and logical reasoning. He has a keen eye for
detail and can make astonishing deductions from seemingly minor clues.
Analytical
and Rational: Holmes approaches cases with a purely analytical and logical
mindset. He relies on evidence, logic, and deduction to solve mysteries. His
thinking is methodical and precise.
Emotionally
Detached: Holmes is often portrayed as emotionally detached and sometimes even
aloof. He prioritizes logic over sentiment and is known for his cool,
calculated demeanor.
Unconventional
Methods: Holmes employs unconventional methods and techniques in his
investigations, such as disguises, chemical experiments, and precise
measurements. He is not bound by traditional investigative procedures.
Main
Driver of Solutions: Holmes is typically the one who unravels the central
mystery and reveals the solution. His deductions often astound both the other
characters in the story and the readers.
John
Watson
The
Narrator and Companion: Watson serves as the narrator of the stories, providing
the readers with insight into Holmes' methods and actions. He is also Holmes'
loyal companion, accompanying him on investigations.
The
Human Element: Watson adds the human element to the stories. Unlike Holmes, he
is more emotionally engaged with the people they encounter and is often moved
by their stories. He provides the empathetic and relatable perspective.
The
Moral Compass: Watson serves as a moral compass and voice of reason. He often
questions Holmes' methods, ensuring that justice is served in a compassionate
and ethical manner.
Complementary
Skills: While Watson lacks Holmes' deductive genius, he is a skilled and
experienced physician. His medical knowledge often proves crucial in attending
to injuries or illnesses encountered during investigations.
Balances
Holmes: Watson's presence serves to balance Holmes' more eccentric and detached
tendencies. He provides a relatable and grounding influence on the brilliant
but sometimes enigmatic detective.
Holmes
and Watson form a symbiotic partnership where Holmes provides the intellectual
brilliance and deductive skills, while Watson offers the emotional depth, moral
perspective, and practical expertise. Together, they make a formidable team in
solving complex mysteries. Their distinct roles and characteristics contribute
to the enduring appeal of the Sherlock Holmes stories.
4. Three British writers Conan Doyle, Ian Fleming and Agatha
Christie are popular detective writers. Sherlock Holmes, James Bond and Hercule
Poirot are their famous creations respectively. Read about these three
characters on the internet and write the chief characteristics of these three
detectives.
Sherlock
Holmes
Sherlock
Holmes is a fictional detective created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. He is known
for his unparalleled powers of observation, deductive reasoning, and logical
thinking. Holmes resides at 221B Baker Street, London, and is often accompanied
by his loyal friend and chronicler, Dr. John Watson. Together, they tackle a
series of complex and intriguing cases, ranging from thefts to murders. Holmes'
iconic deerstalker hat, magnifying glass, and pipe have become synonymous with
detective fiction, making him one of the most enduring and beloved characters
in literature.
Sherlock
Holmes is renowned for his exceptional powers of observation. He notices minute
details that others overlook, allowing him to draw accurate conclusions about
people and situations. Holmes is a master of deductive reasoning. He pieces
together information, applies logic, and arrives at precise conclusions. His
deductive prowess is central to his success in solving complex cases. Holmes is
often depicted as a highly rational and unemotional character. He prioritizes
logic and reason over sentiment, which can sometimes make him appear aloof or
cold. Holmes thrives on solving complex puzzles and mysteries. His analytical
mind allows him to navigate intricate cases with ease. Holmes is skilled at
assuming various disguises to infiltrate different environments and gather
information discreetly. This ability aids him in undercover work.
James
Bond (Agent 007)
James
Bond, created by Ian Fleming, is a fictional British secret agent known by his
code number, 007. Bond works for MI6, the British Secret Intelligence Service,
and is famous for his espionage skills, combat proficiency, and suave demeanor.
He navigates a world of high-stakes espionage, taking on missions that often
involve thwarting international villains and foiling their nefarious plots.
Bond is celebrated for his charismatic charm, resourcefulness, and love for
adventure.
James
Bond, also known as Agent 007, is a fictional British secret agent created by
Ian Fleming. He works for MI6, Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, and is
known for his espionage skills. Bond is depicted as a charming, charismatic,
and sophisticated character. He is well-mannered, stylish, and has a taste for
luxury and fine living. Bond is highly skilled in hand-to-hand combat,
marksmanship, and various forms of combat. He is proficient in using a wide
array of weapons and gadgets. Bond is known for his resourcefulness and ability
to think on his feet. He often finds creative solutions to challenging
situations, whether it's an elaborate escape or a tactical maneuver. Bond
thrives on high-stakes missions and dangerous situations. He is unafraid of taking
risks and is often tasked with missions that require a bold and fearless
approach.
Hercule
Poirot
Hercule
Poirot, created by Agatha Christie, is a fictional Belgian detective renowned
for his meticulous and analytical approach to solving crimes. With his
signature mustache and precise mannerisms, Poirot is a distinctive figure in
detective fiction. He has an unwavering belief in the importance of details and
employs his "little grey cells" to untangle even the most convoluted
mysteries. Poirot often finds himself involved in cases that span continents,
showcasing his international perspective and expertise. His refined demeanor
and methodical techniques make him a beloved and enduring figure in the genre.
Hercule
Poirot, created by Agatha Christie, is a Belgian detective known for his
methodical and analytical approach to solving crimes. He relies on meticulous
examination of evidence. Poirot is known for his keen attention to detail,
similar to Sherlock Holmes. He believes that every small clue is crucial in
solving a case. Poirot is characterized by his refined and precise mannerisms.
He values order and symmetry in both his personal life and his investigations.
Poirot's Belgian origins bring an international perspective to his cases. He is
well-traveled and often encounters cases with an international dimension.
Poirot is known for his idiosyncrasies, such as his meticulous grooming habits
and his insistence on "order" in his surroundings. These quirks
contribute to his distinctive character.
5. Conan Doyle was forced to revive the dead Sherlock Holmes
again. Why do you think the readers forced him to reverse his writing?
The
revival of Sherlock Holmes was primarily driven by the immense popularity and
demand for the character. When Sir Arthur Conan Doyle initially decided to
"kill off" Holmes in the story "The Final Problem" (1893),
he likely intended it to be a definitive end to the series. Doyle was becoming
increasingly frustrated with Holmes overshadowing his other literary works, and
he sought to focus on different genres of writing.
However,
the public's reaction was overwhelmingly passionate and vocal. Readers across
the world expressed their disappointment and even outrage at the demise of
their beloved detective. Holmes had become a cultural icon, and his adventures
had captured the imagination of millions. The character's unique deductive
prowess, coupled with the dynamic partnership with Dr. John Watson, had
endeared him to readers.
The
demand for more Holmes stories was so persistent and persuasive that it
eventually compelled Doyle to reconsider his decision. In 1901, he brought
Holmes back in "The Hound of the Baskervilles," although this story
was set before the events of "The Final Problem."
The
real turning point came with the publication of "The Adventure of the
Empty House" in 1903, where Doyle resurrected Holmes, explaining that he
had faked his own death to evade a dangerous adversary. This revelation
delighted fans and solidified Holmes' status as an enduring literary figure.
The
readers' passionate response to Holmes' "death" highlighted the deep
emotional connection they had formed with the character. Holmes represented a
brilliant, yet relatable, figure who could solve even the most perplexing
mysteries. His return was a testament to the power of storytelling and the
impact a well-crafted character can have on a global audience. The continued
success of Holmes stories further demonstrates the enduring appeal of
characters who capture the imagination and hearts of readers.
Best of Luck
.jpg)
